Would you buy a new phone where you can't take the battery out?

So I am looking at new phones, and I narrowed it down to those 2:

http://www.ztemobiles.com.au/A462.htm

http://www.ztemobiles.com.au/feature_Blade_QLux.htm

The Telstra 4GX Plus is newer while the Telstra 4GX Buzz is older but it lets you take the battery out.

Both have 4GX and can take a 32GB memory card.

So yeah what would you do?

 

Personally, by the time the battery is needing to be replaced (due to not holding a good charge or lasting as long), I'm normally getting a new phone. I've become used to not having replaceable batteries and simply carry a power pack with me if I feel that I'll be using the phone heavily.

 

If it came down to it I'd go for the latest. Many high-end phones now have fixed batteries so it has a tendency to be the norm. I'm not too fussed about being able to remove the battery as long as it lasts for the life of the phone - that latter to me is as long as I have it lol.

 

New phones needing to be ultra slim cannot have removable backs.

It wouldn't surprise me if our cosey EU overlords don't look at Samsung and say - battery must be removable in new electronic goods.

 

A replaceable battery is only really useful if you are going to be carrying and using a spare battery. Modern lithium batteries will easily go for 2 years before beginning to degrade.
Most of the time a drop in battery life can be traced back to the way the phone is set up or to apps on the phone. A back up and reset every 3-6 months does wonders.

I am not really familiar with ZTE devices but the battery in those phones does seem quite small, although the specs seem to be quite low as well, which might allow for the smaller capacity. I assume that they are mid range devices as opposed to high end.

 

I remember when I was a kid if we got 10 minutes out of a battery we were the happiest thing since sliced bread!

Now it doesn't last 6am to 12 midnight its junk... despite being connected to the internet, vastly more complex than a flashlight...

 

Not bothered in the slightest, phones I've had recently couldn't remove the battery.

 

Well the older phone says it has android 5.0.2 which has a ton of unfixed security issues. I'm using an iPhone 7 plus without a removable battery, I think the last phone I had with a removable battery was an old galaxy

 

Probably a similar benefit of having a microsd slot instead of flash storage, just not sure what benefit is there

 

AFAIK all the published vulnerabilities with all versions of lollipop were patched, mainly with ota background fixes. I know some vulnerabilities require a kernel update but that would be the manufacturers responsibility.

I don't know much about the Australian market but €100 gets you a mid range spec phone on a small monthly bill in Ireland. Looking at the specs they would be relatively low end on screen size etc.

 

Any reason you prefer marshmallow over nougat?

 

6.0 added a bunch of optimizations that increase battery life, and Android 7.0 (which was released in August) improves the battery saving features and adds a multi window view and some other things. 7.1 (released a few days ago) improves all of that. If you get a phone with Android 5.0.2 you're almost 2 years behind on updates.

That's not even close to comparable. They did send out replacements with new batteries and those had issues too. And if a phone is having issues with their battery exploding you'd be better off getting a new phone than just replacing the battery and hoping for the best. There are a lot of fail safes throughout the phone to protect the battery, so I'm not sure 100% of the blame is on the battery anyways

If you're really worried about quality you probably shouldn't be buying a $100 phone from some budget manufacturer