Why? Because they literally banned someone's avatar because it was a picture of Donald Trump. You know, that controversial guy who just became the US president yesterday. Via: Now admittedly, that might be fine on a smaller forum. Like say, a very specialist one where avatars have to be all professional looking pictures of the users, or politics isn't tolerated at all for whatever reason. But this is basically an equivalent to Steam. It's like if YouTube removed someone's avatar because it had Barack Obama as the picture. It just sounds ridiculous. However, that's still not the biggest kicker here. Oh no, just read through this discussion and tell me what sounds insane here: It's unbelievable isn't it? It's basically saying 'if enough people flag something, we'll remove it regardless of whether it's against the rules'. Actual judgement or moderation? Who needs that eh? We'll just delete whatever people report as offensive too many times! Really though, if you're running a community or service, do not do this. Reports are there to be looked and evaluated, not as an automated content removal system. what do you think of this insanity?