https://edition.cnn.com/2019/08/16/...lan-gun-violence-white-nationalism/index.html
That's exactly what they said about Trump.
O'Rourke isn't a member here, so obviously can't answer. It's an idea he expressed, so it isn't like it's all hashed out and ready for a vote. And he doesn't seem to be the type to just do what he wants via Executive Order, if he became President. Perhaps some changes will evolve from these ideas, no matter who becomes our 46th president. It might not be so bad if some version of these ideas come to fruition. Why shouldn't webmasters be accountable in some fashion for the content on their sites?
What would those be? Is it unreasonable to hold someone accountable for what they own, how it is used and, in most cases, how they make money off it? Since O'Rourke didn't offer specific details as to what these "constraints" would be, we don't know if any of them would be unrealistic.
From experiance with every other law passed by politicians lately.
That's exactly what they said about Trump.
That's what's called contempt prior to investigation.
That's exactly what they said about Trump.
O'Rourke's ideas might be a bit over-reach, but might also have some merit.
Could be rhetoric, there's a lot of that going around. But they've found a way to make bartenders and owners accountable for drunks; they have made it a crime to shout FIRE in crowded venues and there are already laws banning certain other forms of expression. So, there are a number of reasons this would happen, even if it's all watered down. Then some politician will also claim this would be a wonderful job creator - more law enforcement, more lawyers, more forum moderators.
Try to resist the urge to troll. If the conversation isn't exciting enough for you, find one that is.
Not necessarily, they could block such a law, you really overestimate the power (and will) of the courts. Even if they do block it, it could be in force for quite a while before it is blocked.
